Олег К писал(а):
...Что еще присочиним?
Не-не, ответы принимаются в порядке их поступления. Возвращаю к заданному ишшо три дня назад вопросу.
Специальные награды:
Achievement Award, Science and Applications Directorate, Manned Spacecraft Center, 1969.
Achievement Award, Apollo Science Team, NASA, 1970.
Achievement Award, Lunar Receiving Laboratory Program Office, NASA, 1969.
Achievement Award, Apollo Principal Investigator on Lunar Samples, NASA, 1969-1975.Джеймс Доусон (James P. Dawson), НАСА, сотрудник главной лаборатории по приемке и первичному изучению ЛГ (LRL, Хьюстон), главный исследователь лунных образцов НАСА в период 1969-1975 гг. пишет:
The biggest problem was, too, is that when they got it all in, we had the same kind of rocks out in the backyard. The only difference was, there was less water in the lunar samples, but it looked just like the rocks we'd collected all over the world. So to a lot of the scientists that was a great disappointment.
http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/history/oral_hi ... 1-9-00.pdfПеревод: "Самая большая проблема была еще и в том, что все предъявленное
ничем не отличалось от камней на заднем дворе. Единственная разница была в том, что в лунных образцах было меньше воды, но выглядели они точно так же, как те камни, которые мы собирали по всему миру.
Для большого количество ученых это было большим разочарованием".
Упоминание о "меньшем количестве воды" ясно говорит о том, что речь идет не только о внешнем сходстве.
Вопрос - что же "исследовали" "независимые зарубежные ученые" Бегеманны с Бхандариями в виде нескольких миллиграммов "лунной" пыли?
И цитата №2.
«They had a sample that they called the Genesis rock, and we had it, had a piece of it. We split it to do our experiments. When we did, we found that there was a glass sphere, little bitty, of course, but there were little bitty glass spheres in the sample. Now, for that glass to form like that, like they form marbles now, they melt the glass and drop it, and they drop into usually warm oil or something. But when it's in the air, the surface tension pulls it and it's round. So that had to be done without touching anything.
We also found some that were dumbbells, where the two glass pieces have plugged together. So that meant there were some mixing when this occurred.
Also one of these had been hit by something and there was a groove across one end of the dumbbell, where something solid had hit it before it completely solidified.
That's fine, except we also found perfect cubes of glass, and to form a perfect cube of glass takes extremely slow cooling, with absolutely no interference.
The point is, all three of these could not have been made at the same time under the same conditions, and could not have been made inside that rock. That rock had to be a composite. So what part were you going to count to make it four billion years old?
You could not. You never heard NASA say anything more about the four billion-year-old rock. All the great scientists were flipping, because here are a bunch of young cats down there playing engineering, using engineering parameters, were really poking holes in the idea that the Moon was four billion years old, which is what NASA put out.
From what we could tell, it couldn't possibly be more than 20,000 years old. So the counts, the radiation counts, are almost fictitious, because you don't know what was there to start with.
They say, "Well, when something is formed, like a rock formed, melted, from that point on, it decays." Well, that's fine. But what do you do if every rock out there is a mixture? I mean, how many pure rocks do you have? Diamond. Okay. This sort of thing. They don't know».
Для Вас английский, как Вы много раз заявляли, не проблема. Сколько форум будет ждать комментарии или хотя бы ответ на вопрос –
зачем жулики подделали «говнезис рог»?
Вопросы эти придется повторять либо до капитулирен насабаранов, либо до вмешательства модератора.
Вход
{ GALLERY }
FAQ
Поиск
Бегеманн из калифорнийского Lunatic Asylum, стало быть, стажировался в Германии в институте Макса Планка (там же)... 
